Faculty Academy Web Site Unraveled: But. Um. Why?

It occurred to me after I published yesterday’s post that I should probably talk about why I think it’s important to do all the things I was trying to do with the Faculty Academy Web site. I’ve already touched on a few or those reasons — mainly the selfish desire to learn more about how WP/WPMU works and to, hopefully, discover some techniques/ideas that I could put to use on other projects. But I don’t want to suggest that putting together this site was purely an exercise; I’d like to believe that there was actually some meaningful purpose behind the experience.

In a former job, I spent a lot of time planing Web sites, thinking about their communicative goals, talking to focus groups and committees about their purpose and how we would measure their success. While I learned a lot from that experience, and I think I was able to put what I learned to good use, truthfully, a lot of it felt like wheel spinning. Talking about what we were trying to do so as to convince ourselves we understood what we were trying to do. Making a science (or a study) out of something that still, for me, often feels very nebulous and difficult to define.

So one of the reasons I love, love, love working on the site for Faculty Academy is that it has a somewhat short life-time (I know that it serves a purpose as an ongoing, permanent archive of the event, but it’s core user functionality is really critical for only about 6-8 weeks prior to the conference). It’s also a small enough conference, with enough returning attendees (most from within my own University), that I have some freedom to try new things and not worry too much if they backfire. Sure, the cfp and registration system needs to work. The program needs to be clear and easy-to-find. Logistical information needs to be accurate and consistent, but, beyond that, there’s a lot of opportunity to play.

This idea of “playing” as a way of building a Web site is, more and more, a much more rewarding way for me to work on sites. I feel pretty lucky that most of what I build online these days has a somewhat short life-span (a semester, perhaps), is done in collaboration with other playful individuals (my colleagues in DTLT and the amazing faculty and students at UMW), and doesn’t contain a lot of “serious,” institutional data that I need to worry about vetting with a huge committee or administration.

That said, I don’t want to downplay the importance of these projects. I just think course management systems, with all of their institutional-looking interfaces and static feature sets have lulled a lot of us (instructional technologists, faculty, students), into thinking that building online experiences within the Academy needs to be a locked-down, top-down, “standardized” experience. I think that’s just antithetical to how we ultimately teach and learn.

So as I embarked on this year’s conference site, I was seeking to build a site that could serve the following goals:

* provide clear, accurate information about the event (that’s a no-brainer)
* allow people to easily register or submit proposals (again, duh)
* provide an online venue for pre-conference interaction and investigation
* provide an online venue for live conference activity and monitoring of conference activities happening in other spaces

True:

* Not a lot of people added tags to program items
* I’m not sure how many people cared that there was a “live” feed of current sessions on the home page.
* As far as I can tell from the Google Analytics, no one viewed any of the archived conference video from previous years that I highlighted in the site footer prior to the event.
* Only a handful of people used delicious to add bookmarks that were tagged “umwfa09.”

But, by no means, do I think any of what I tried was a failure. First, as I’ve said before, I learned a ton doing it. I’m never failing when I’m learning. Second, even if a lot of people didn’t participate in some of the opportunities I provided, I believe a few people had seeds planted that we can continue to nurture throughout the year and at next year’s conference. Bit by bit, we make inroads. And we also model for our faculty, our students, and ourselves a way of building and creating that values learning, creativity, experimentation, and even “failure.”

Faculty Academy Web Site Unraveled: Using Free & Open Source Tools for a Conference Web Site

Over the next week or so, I’m planning on putting up a bunch of posts about the work I did this year on the Faculty Academy Web site. Every year, working on this site is a particularly fun project for me, starting four years ago when we first began to host the conference Web site at www.facultyacademy.org with a one-off WordPress install. And every year, I’ve tried to use the project as an opportunity to push myself to learn more about how to use WordPress as a site for an event/conference. I spend an awful lot of time barking up the wrong trees and generally getting myself in trouble, but I chalk it all up to a great learning experience. For example, what I learned this year will not only come in handy as we put together the site next year, I’m also imagining how I can use it to help with a regional instructional technology conference that we often participate in here in Virginia and how I can put my lessons to use in the revamped DTLT Web site that went on hold as FA ramped up.

To start with, I’ll run quickly through a number of the tools, plugins, etc. that I made use of this year. I’ll try to dig deeper into what worked and what didn’t work for each one in future posts:

WordPress/WPMU: The conference site “proper” has lived within WordPress for several years now. I toyed with the idea of using something different this year, but ended up settling on WP again for a couple of reasons. One thing different this year was the the site was actually a blog within a WPMU install that Jim Groom helped me set up. The plan is to migrate all of our past FA sites to this install so that we can more easily upgrade, maintain (and possibly link) them. Another reason I decided to go with WP/WPMU was that we were hoping to use BuddyPress as a way to solicit registrations and proposals this year. We thought we might be able to set up custom user fields for the information we ask for when people are registering or submiting a presentation. Then, everyone would have an accounts on the site and we could maybe use that to build some kind of stronger online community presence for the conference. Bottom line, the BuddyPress experiment didn’t work out for a couple of reasons, but I’m still glad we went with WPMU. I think being able to migrate all of the conference sites to this platform — and build future conference sites within it — could pay off in the long run. Plus, it allowed me to get my feet wet with WPMU and to develop a deeper understanding of how that system works.

Google Docs/Spreadsheets: For the last three or four years, we’ve been using PhpSurveyor/LimeSurvey as the tool for soliciting registrations and proposals. It was a fine solution, but there were a couple of things about it that I wasn’t nuts about. For one, because it’s really a survey tool, the internal language in the application often confused people. I ended up hacking the core code so that there were no references to “survey” when people filled out the form. There was also no way to send people emails upon completion of the survey — which we got a few complaints about. Also, we had gotten to the point with that tool that we were making use of branching so that we could have one form for both registration and proposal submission. This seemed needlessly complicated. It was a pain to set up, and it was a pain to switch the forms mid-stream when the cfp would close but registration was still open. Finally, the output from PhpSurveyor isn’t very pretty. I ended up doing a bunch of exports periodically to a .csv or .xls file, and then cutting and pasting things together. I was always paranoid that I would screw up the cut-and-paste, and I felt like I was juggling way too much.

As I mentioned above, we toyed with the idea briefly of going with BuddyPress for this purpose, but we weren’t thrilled with how that was going to play out. So, instead, I used a Google Form/Spreadsheet which I embedded into the conference site. I’m not sure I’d do it again: there was a fair amount of template hacking (because I wanted more control over the form styling), Patrick still had to write a custom script for me so that people could get emails when forms were submitted, we ended up separating the cfp and the registration process which WAS better for us but may have been more complicated for users. All that said, having the data in a spreadsheet was very cool.

Exhibit/Google Spreadsheet: We’ve never had a dynamic registrant list on the site before — there was never any easy way to feed registration data into a place where we could consume it. But this year, when I realized that all of our registration data was going to be in a Google spreadsheet, I also realized it would be very easy to set up an Exhibit to display the data. It actually took a fair amount of time to set this up — more template hacking and some issues with getting the data to feed out of Google docs properly. But once it was set up, it worked seamlessly.

Various WP Plugins: I used a whole slew of new WP plugins for the site. It’s always fun to have a project that allows you to experiment with new plugins, and FA is a great opportunity to try things on:

* Add Link and FeedWordPress: I knew from some recent posts by Jim that these two plugins were working really well together, but I couldn’t believe how easy they made it to add a “Live Blogging” feature to the site while the conference ran (and beyond). We had about 8-10 people add their blog address/feed, and we’re still featuring any posts they write that they put in a category called “umwfa09.”

* More Fields and Advanced Custom Field Widget: I had experimented a few months ago with a plugin called “Flutter” which makes it easier to add custom fields (and create custom write panels), but it had some bugs and didn’t really work properly on WPMU. This time around, I discovered “More Fields” which is dirt-simple to setup and use. Then I stumbled on “Advanced Custom Field Widget” which makes it even dirt-simpler to display the values of custom fields in the sidebar. Bottom line: I was able to use the combination of these two plugins to enter session data for each presentation (location, time slot, format, presenters, etc.) and display it in the sidebar for each presentation’s post.

* Advanced Category Excluder and More Privacy Options: One of the challenges of working on a site for a conference that is coming up/ongoing is that you’re working on a site that people are going to be hitting regularly. You don’t want to show them some of what you’re working on for the actual days leading up to/of the conference. I was able to use these two plugins to hide certain activity until I was ready to make it available.

* FeedBurner FeedSmith: I’d never used a FeedBurner feed for a WordPress site before, but I’m glad I did this time. Not only did it allow me to track subscriptions to the site feed, I was able to set up a way for people to receive updates via email — which was really important since the plugin we’ve used for this in the past — Subscribe2 — wasn’t playing nicely with WPMU.

* Flickr Photo Album and Quick Flickr Widget: I actually used two different Flickr plugins at different times in the life of the site to display photos from Flickr. Flickr Photo Album was ideal for the display I wanted leading up to the conference (and made it easy to embed previous FA photos in pages/posts), but when the conference was running live, I preferred the output of Quick Flickr Widget on the home page to show a live feed of photos.

* WPtouch iPhone Theme: I don’t know who else benefitted from this besides Andy :-) , but it was very cool to be able to simply install a plugin and have an iPhone/iPod touch-ready conference site.

* Yet Another Related Post Plugin: I kind of threw this one in at the last minute as the program was going live, and I was very pleasently pleased with the results. Basically, it allowed to me suggest related conference presentations for each individual session. If you’ve got a community that is actively tagging conference content (which ours wasn’t–see below), I could see this being very dynamic.

* Matt’s Community Tags: So often when you’re working on a site like this you spend an inordinate amount of time on a feature that seems really important to YOU but no one else cares about. This was one of those. But I don’t care, because I still think it’s a neat feature and maybe we’ll use it in the future. Basically, it allowed anyone to suggest a tag for any conference post (including all of the presentation posts). The tags go into moderation (which isn’t necessarily ideal), and you can use this to grow your tag cloud and, ultimatley, your understanding of the ideas inspired at the conference.

There were a few other great plugins that helped with the basic content-management aspects of the site, but I won’t go into all of those here.

For those who care, the theme I used was a seriously hacked version of WordPress Magazine Theme. It had good bones for what I wanted to do.

The feature of the site that I was most proud of, though, really didn’t require any special plugins — just a pretty mild hack to index.php. I knew I wanted to have something on the conference home page that displayed what was going on right now as the conference was running. It occurred to me the weekend before the conference that all I needed to do was create a post for each conference time slot with links to the various presentations and then time them to publish at the time when the slot began (actually, Jerry suggested going with 15 minutes prior to the beginning of a session, and that worked better). I put all of these posts in a new category called “currently.” Then I put a custom Loop on the home page that just displayed the most-recent post in that category. Voila! Dyanmic conference program on the Web site. I have no idea if anyone cared that there was a dynamic program on the Web site, but, again, I learned something figuring it out.

So. That was a lot longer than I intended. Maybe I don’t need to do individual posts about different tools now, but I think I still will, if only to document the successes and challenges for myself.

Help Us Wrap-Up the Conference!

At 4:00 in University Hall we’ll be having a quick wrap-up of the conference prior to the DTLT “Bonus Session.” As preparation, we’re asking all attendees to go to this form and quickly respond to six questions. We’ll take a look at the results and discuss them at 4.

Thank you!

Reflections on Day One of The (Un)Common University

Lots of great take aways from this first day of the conference.

James Boyle’s talk was inspiring, engaging, simply awesome. In Twitter someone said he had the audience in the palm of his hand, and that was certainly evident looking around the room. There was so much to take away from his talk, but I’ll mention two things that jumped out at me.

* It’s really interesting how we avoid thinking about issues of open-ness vs/ closed-ness in self interested terms. The conversation always seems to veer towards discussions of values and philosophies. I think values and philosophies are great — but Boyle reminded us that openness is also a great choice because it can serve our self-interests. We just tend assume it can’t.

This reminds me a lot of the way my dad talks about environmentalism. He’s a biologist with the Office of Endangered Species, and although he certainly believes in the mission of the ESA for philosophical reasons, he’s also great at reminding people that preserving species and the environment is a choice that protects our own self-interests.

It’s OK to be self-interested. It’s even better when our self-interests jive with our philosophies. :-)

* At one point Boyle basically referred to the practice of teaching as the ultimate mashup. Teachers are constantly “stealing” techniques, lesson plans, activities, styles from each other — often without attribution. The next time I’m talking to faculty about mashups, I plan to use this as a means to explain the concept.

During Lunch, Jim Groom and John St. Clair blew us all away with the mock debate, “Is the CMS dead?” Jim, quite predictably and charmingly went the zombie route. John, however, well. . .who knew John had that in him? I can’t describe it. I recommend visiting the faculty academy Web site in a week or so and watching the video.

In the afternoon, Cole Camplese’s plenary captured people’s imaginations about how we can use lightweight emerging technologies to redefine our notion of conversation in the classroom. The number of questions and comments at the end of his presentation spoke to how he clearly engaged the faculty at UMW and our guest visitors. My favorite anecdote from his presentation was about the student who tweeted one evening that he had just realized his thesis was due the following day — a week earlier than he had thought. Out of nowhere, his classmates jumped in to assist — proofreading, helping with endnote formatting, meeting in the Library to discuss a draft. In the course of that evening, the entire class suddenly understood what Twitter could do for them.

And now, I’m sitting in Laura Blankenship’s workshop on personal learning networks where about twelve of us are brainstorming how to use lightweight web-based tools to accomplish all sorts of tasks and connect with the people who can help us to work, learn, and live online. Frabulous!

We’ll close the day with some wine and food and be back in the morning to start it all over again.

I wish everyday could be Faculty Academy.

Faculty Academy is Upon Us

It’s that time of year. Again. Tomorrow will mark day one of yet another Faculty Academy at the University of Mary Washington. Once again, we’ve got a stellar line-up of guest speakers and faculty presenters. This year’s conference planning has been particularly poignant and meaningful for me, and I’m extraordinarly grateful to my colleagues in DTLT and the faculty at UMW who are contributing to the program. Plus, it’s very exciting to have James Boyle, Laura Blankenshpi, and Cole Camplese coming to contribute to the conversation.

I truly believe that the innovative thinking and work that is shared at events like Faculty Academy can point us toward the future of higher education. I feel very lucky to have the opportunity every year to help showcase and promote the thinking, experimentation, and creativity that this event represents.

See you on the other side.

Cultural Agoraphobia: What Universities Need to Know About Our Bias Against Openness

In this presentation, Professor James Boyle will argue that we have a cognitive bias–he calls it cultural agoraphobia–that leads us to underestimate the potential of open networks, open culture and open productive processes. What is the evidence for such a bias? What should a university do about it–from the library to the classroom to the archive? Using examples ranging from the development of the World Wide Web to Wikipedia and open source software, this talk will try and answer those questions.

Faculty Academy 2009 Final Schedule Available

We’re pleased to announce that the final program for Faculty Academy 2009 is now available. We have over 30 concurrent presentations scheduled over the course of the two-day event, with faculty representing both campuses and over a dozen disciplines.

Over the course of the next day, abstracts for all of the sessions will be available on the site and will be linked to from the program page.

We’re very excited about the breadth and depth of topics that will be covered at this year’s event, and we’re grateful to all of our presenters for putting together proposals at this very busy time of year!

“How I use Drupal to roll my own LMS,” or “Eight Reasons why Drupal is better than WordPress”

In this presentation, I will give an overview of how and why I use Drupal as my platform of choice for creating online learning spaces. Since my assigned teaching area is New Media, my pedagogy is often as much *about* technology as it is *through* technology. Therefore, the choices I make regarding our course websites give shape to the opportunities my students have for creating content and learning to express themselves digitally within a participatory learning experience. These choices must closely reflect and demonstrate my teaching philosophy and pedagogical agenda. For this brief talk, I will structure my remarks around a list of ways in which Drupal is better than WordPress. This somewhat facetious framework invokes the long-running generic debate between proponents of the two platforms, but it is not necessarily my aim to convince WordPress adherents to switch sides. Rather, I will focus on why Drupal has been a good choice for me and ultimately argue that a working knowledge of how any works with or against pedagogical goals is an important component of course design.

Profiling eLearning Website Feature Preferences: An Empirical Study

Learning in an eLearning presents different perspective in terms of preference of learning environment components. The patterns of eLearning website feature preferences were investigated in order to provide insights into learning strategies for learners. The focus of this investigation is to develop a classification of types of eLearning website feature preferences (clusters) and investigate their association with the learning of students as indicated via their performance. Based on an empirical study, researcher collected and analyzed students’ eLearning website feature preference in Blackboard. Nine measures were used to cluster the data set. The results revealed four clusters, viz.: Moderate eLearning Feature Preference Exhibitor, High eLearning Feature Preference Exhibitor, Heavy eLearning Feature Preference Sleeper and Moderate eLearning Feature Preference Sleeper, and demonstrated that learning as indicated by performance (grade point average range) different among the four clusters. The implications of eLearning feature preference are discussed from learning and teaching perspectives.

Online Meeting Toolbox

The Education departments on the Fredericksburg and Stafford campus of UMW are in the initial stages of planning for a College of Education. This planning will involve a large number of meetings, bringing together approximately twenty faculty members on two different campuses. The problems in scheduling such meetings are obvious and are compounded by the very different work schedules for the two faculties. One approach to alleviating some of the problems would be to make use of an assortment of free, online social networking tools: the meeting toolbox. The toolbox includes the following programs: Skype, Pamela, Google Docs, Jing, Doodle Calendar, Glogster, and Survey Monkey. A blog will provide a home/archive for the toolbox and the documents, recordings, and video records compiled through the use of the different tools. Hardware, such as the Pulse Smartpen, webcams, and digital video cameras may also be included in the toolbox as opportunities and needs arise. This presentation will discuss the components of the toolbox and the results of initial use of several of the tools. The use of the toolbox in online learning will also be briefly discussed.